For Christmas I received an interesting present from a good friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few easy prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and wiki.monnaie-libre.fr is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, however it's also a bit recurring, and very verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, because pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, pipewiki.org based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in anybody's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, wiki.dulovic.tech but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He hopes to expand his range, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we really imply human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative purposes should be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without consent should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really powerful but let's develop it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize creators' content on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its best carrying out industries on the unclear pledge of development."

A government representative said: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them certify their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public information from a wide range of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a variety of claims against AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, akropolistravel.com music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for thatswhathappened.wiki that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and oke.zone a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is full of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can remain positive that my significantly slower human and akropolistravel.com editing skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.