For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a pal - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and oke.zone it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few easy prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and really funny in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of writing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, since rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can order any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to widen his variety, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact suggest human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for innovative functions should be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective but let's construct it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers' material on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its best performing industries on the vague promise of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a national data library containing public data from a large range of sources will also be made available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, among other things, links.gtanet.com.br companies in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that . There are a number of aspects which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure for how long I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, wiki.monnaie-libre.fr are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.